[
  {
    "title": "Anthropic is cutting off third-party harnesses (OpenClaw, etc.) from subscription limits starting April 4 -- here's what it means",
    "subreddit": "openclaw",
    "score": 460,
    "comments": 344,
    "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/openclaw/comments/1sbshpu/anthropic_is_cutting_off_thirdparty_harnesses/",
    "externalUrl": "https://www.reddit.com/r/openclaw/comments/1sbshpu/anthropic_is_cutting_off_thirdparty_harnesses/",
    "selftext": "Just got the email. Starting tomorrow at 12pm PT, tools like OpenClaw will no longer draw from your Claude subscription. They'll need \"extra usage\" — a separate pay-as-you-go layer billed on top of your existing sub. The carrot: one-time credit equal to your monthly plan price (redeem by April 17) and bundle discounts up to 30%. The stick: they're offering a full subscription refund if you don't want to play ball. For those of us running agentic pipelines, local orchestration daemons, or multi-model routing setups on top of Claude — this is a meaningful shift. \"Subscription covers Claude Code and Cowork\" is doing a lot of work in that email. Translation: if it's not our product, you're paying extra. LOL\n\nNot surprised they're doing this. These harnesses hammer their infra in ways the average chat user doesn't. Still stings when you've built workflows around the subscription model.\n\n",
    "created": "2026-04-03T22:54:02.000Z",
    "topComments": [
      {
        "author": "superpunchbrother",
        "body": "It was fun while it lasted 🫡 ",
        "score": 26
      },
      {
        "author": "morliac",
        "body": "Sad move, this will send a huge wave of customers straight to OpenAI...\n\nhttps://preview.redd.it/c5b2flqq42tg1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=32cf422f3aaa41524199c3ee0edcc2fdc1b435b2",
        "score": 63
      },
      {
        "author": "foramperandi",
        "body": "I continue to be impressed by the professional communication from Anthropic.  Between rolling out major changes with less than 24h on Friday afternoon and announcing changes only on employee's personal twitter accounts, it's a class act top to bottom over there.",
        "score": 109
      },
      {
        "author": "Klauciusz",
        "body": "Well... We all knew this was comming. Just dropped my max. Hellloooooo, OpenAI...",
        "score": 33
      },
      {
        "author": "gomezluisj",
        "body": "I'm a Claude Pro user and the rate limits were already ridiculous, so for me it was not worth the 20$ month. I've been using Qwen3.6-plus for free on Openrouter for the last couple of days and i'm very happy with the results, will probably pay for it once it's no longer free.",
        "score": 12
      }
    ],
    "titleZh": "Anthropic将从4月4日起禁止第三方工具（如OpenClaw等）绕过订阅限制——具体含义如下",
    "contentZh": "刚收到邮件。明天太平洋时间中午12点起，OpenClaw这类工具将不再占用Claude订阅额度，而是需要\"额外用量\"——在现有订阅之上另设的按量付费层。甜头：一次性赠送等额月费的积分（限4月17日前兑换），以及最高30%的捆绑折扣；大棒：不接受者可获全额退款。对于我们这些在Claude之上运行智能体流水线、本地编排守护进程或多模型路由配置的用户来说，这是重大转变。\"订阅涵盖Claude Code",
    "commentsZh": [
      {
        "author": "superpunchbrother",
        "bodyZh": "开心过就好 🫡",
        "score": 26
      },
      {
        "author": "morliac",
        "bodyZh": "令人遗憾的举动，这将导致大量客户直接流向OpenAI...",
        "score": 63
      },
      {
        "author": "foramperandi",
        "bodyZh": "Anthropic 的专业沟通方式持续令我\"印象深刻\"：既要在周五下午用不到 24 小时就推出重大变更，又只在员工的个人账号上宣布这些变更。",
        "score": 109
      },
      {
        "author": "Klauciusz",
        "bodyZh": "唉...早料到会有这一天。刚取消了最高档订阅。哈喽~~~，OpenAI...",
        "score": 33
      },
      {
        "author": "gomezluisj",
        "bodyZh": "我是Claude Pro用户，之前的速率限制就已经很离谱了，所以对我来说每月20美元根本不值。过去几天我一直在Openrouter上免费使用Qwen3.6-plus，而且我非常...",
        "score": 12
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "title": "\"Cognitive surrender\" leads AI users to abandon logical thinking, research finds",
    "subreddit": "ArtificialInteligence",
    "score": 112,
    "comments": 40,
    "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1sc5u8g/cognitive_surrender_leads_ai_users_to_abandon/",
    "externalUrl": "https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/research-finds-ai-users-scarily-willing-to-surrender-their-cognition-to-llms/",
    "selftext": "In [“Thinking—Fast, Slow, and Artificial: How AI is Reshaping Human Reasoning and the Rise of Cognitive Surrender,”](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646) researchers from the University of Pennsylvania sought to build on existing scholarship that outlines two broad categories of decision-making: one shaped by “fast, intuitive, and affective processing” (System 1); and one shaped by “slow, deliberative, and analytical reasoning” (System 2). The onset of AI systems, the researchers argue, has created a new, third category of “artificial cognition” in which decisions are driven by “external, automated, data-driven reasoning originating from algorithmic systems rather than the human mind.”",
    "created": "2026-04-04T10:31:56.000Z",
    "topComments": [
      {
        "author": "djaybe",
        "body": "Boss asked me this week \"So can't these people think for themselves anymore?\"\n\nMe: The ones who didn't think before, still aren't thinking. The ones who didn't want to learn before, still don't want to learn. AI is not the problem.",
        "score": 40
      },
      {
        "author": "ClankerCore",
        "body": "We have cognitive surrender at home.\n\nCognitive surrender at home:\n\nhttps://preview.redd.it/cez7ulexi5tg1.jpeg?width=1269&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fdccc8b074939e8a8bd62284b1278f8353766b65",
        "score": 38
      },
      {
        "author": "Chance-the-Gardener",
        "body": "I give up, thinking about this is too hard. I'll ask Claude.",
        "score": 10
      },
      {
        "author": "Necessary_Sun_4392",
        "body": "Leading to or putting a spotlight on?\n\n![gif](giphy|yxy69FCE06Ql0Fjk4Z)\n\n",
        "score": 7
      },
      {
        "author": "immersive-matthew",
        "body": "I have the exact opposite experience as the biggest gap in LLMs is their lack of logic and thus I am using that skill to fill in the gap more than ever. ",
        "score": 5
      }
    ],
    "titleZh": "研究发现：\"认知投降\"使AI用户放弃逻辑思维",
    "contentZh": "在《思考——快、慢与人工：人工智能如何重塑人类推理与认知投降的兴起》一文中，宾夕法尼亚大学的研究人员试图在现有学术成果的基础上进一步拓展。现有研究概述了决策制定的两大类别：一类由\"快速、直觉且情感化的加工\"（系统1）所塑造；另一类则由\"缓慢、审慎且分析性的推理\"（系统2）所塑造。研究者认为，人工智能系统的出现创造了一种全新的第三类\"人工认知\"，在这种认知模式下，决策是",
    "commentsZh": [
      {
        "author": "djaybe",
        "bodyZh": "老板这周问我：\"难道这些人现在都不会独立思考了吗？\"\n\n我回答：以前不思考的人，现在仍然不思考；以前不想学习的人，现在仍然不想学习。",
        "score": 40
      },
      {
        "author": "ClankerCore",
        "bodyZh": "我们家里有认知投降。\n\n家里的认知投降：\n\n[图片链接]",
        "score": 38
      },
      {
        "author": "Chance-the-Gardener",
        "bodyZh": "算了，想这个太费劲了，我去问Claude吧。",
        "score": 10
      },
      {
        "author": "Necessary_Sun_4392",
        "bodyZh": "导致还是聚焦？",
        "score": 7
      },
      {
        "author": "immersive-matthew",
        "bodyZh": "我的经历恰恰相反——大语言模型最大的短板正是逻辑能力的缺失，因此我比以往任何时候都更依赖这项技能来弥补这一不足。",
        "score": 5
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "title": "Professor Marandi DESTROYS the western narrative with their own logic!",
    "subreddit": "iran",
    "score": 80,
    "comments": 4,
    "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/iran/comments/1sc9yx2/professor_marandi_destroys_the_western_narrative/",
    "externalUrl": "https://i.redd.it/fnd515slj6tg1.jpeg",
    "selftext": "",
    "created": "2026-04-04T13:59:38.000Z",
    "topComments": [
      {
        "author": "BigIndependencePlan",
        "body": "Hahaha burn !!",
        "score": 1
      },
      {
        "author": "AutoModerator",
        "body": "Readers, please consider making a donation to the [Iranian Red Crescent Society](https://donate.redcrossredcrescent.org/ifrc/iran-complex-emergency-2026/~my-donation). Thank you!\n\n\n*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/iran) if you have any questions or concerns.*",
        "score": 1
      }
    ],
    "titleZh": "马兰迪教授用西方自己的逻辑粉碎了西方叙事！",
    "contentZh": "",
    "commentsZh": [
      {
        "author": "BigIndependencePlan",
        "bodyZh": "哈哈哈，怼得好！",
        "score": 1
      },
      {
        "author": "AutoModerator",
        "bodyZh": "读者们，请考虑向[伊朗红新月会](https://donate.redcrossredcrescent.org/ifrc/iran-complex-emergency-2026/~my-donation)捐款。谢谢！\n\n*我是机器人，th",
        "score": 1
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "title": "\"They tried to bury us, they didn't know we were seeds.\"",
    "subreddit": "iran",
    "score": 60,
    "comments": 1,
    "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/iran/comments/1sc90n4/they_tried_to_bury_us_they_didnt_know_we_were/",
    "externalUrl": "https://v.redd.it/wvsvm2zjb6tg1",
    "selftext": "",
    "created": "2026-04-04T13:17:05.000Z",
    "topComments": [
      {
        "author": "AutoModerator",
        "body": "Readers, please consider making a donation to the [Iranian Red Crescent Society](https://donate.redcrossredcrescent.org/ifrc/iran-complex-emergency-2026/~my-donation). Thank you!\n\n\n*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/iran) if you have any questions or concerns.*",
        "score": 1
      }
    ],
    "titleZh": "他们企图埋葬我们，却不知道我们是种子。",
    "contentZh": "",
    "commentsZh": [
      {
        "author": "AutoModerator",
        "bodyZh": "读者们，请考虑向[伊朗红新月会](https://donate.redcrossredcrescent.org/ifrc/iran-complex-emergency-2026/~my-donation)捐款。谢谢！\n\n*我是机器人，并且……",
        "score": 1
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "title": "Anthropic just killed my 17-agent pipeline. Here's how I migrated everything to Claude Code in one afternoon",
    "subreddit": "openclaw",
    "score": 57,
    "comments": 62,
    "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/openclaw/comments/1sc48l6/anthropic_just_killed_my_17agent_pipeline_heres/",
    "externalUrl": "https://www.reddit.com/r/openclaw/comments/1sc48l6/anthropic_just_killed_my_17agent_pipeline_heres/",
    "selftext": "Got the email this morning. Third-party harness support ends today at 12pm PT. I run 17 agents on OpenClaw - 10 platform promo agents, 7 content pipeline crons. All on a Max subscription.\n\nThe good news: Claude Code is explicitly covered by the subscription. And it turns out the migration is embarrassingly simple.\n\n**What I did:**\n\n1. Created a CLAUDE.md file in each OpenClaw workspace directory. This is the entry point - tells Claude \"you are this agent, read HEARTBEAT.md, follow it step by step.\" About 20 lines per agent.\n2. Created a script bash wrapper that runs claude -p --model sonnet --dangerously-skip-permissions and pipes output to Slack via curl.\n3. Replaced OpenClaw heartbeats with macOS crontab entries. Same intervals, same schedule.\n4. Set CLAUDE\\_CODE\\_OAUTH\\_TOKEN in crontab (claude uses Keychain which cron can't access).\n\nThat's it. My agents run the exact same HEARTBEAT.md, PLAYBOOK.md, SOUL.md, BROWSER-\\*.md files they always did. Zero rewrite of agent logic\n\n**What caught me off guard:**\n\n* claude binary is at \\~/.local/bin/claude - not in cron's default PATH\n* Cron can't access macOS Keychain - need the OAuth token as env var\n* \\--bare flag breaks auth for subscription users (skips OAuth)\n\n**The one-liner per agent:**\n\n`claude -p --model sonnet --dangerously-skip-permissions --append-system-prompt \"You are the Reddit agent. Read CLAUDE.md first, follow HEARTBEAT.md.\" \"Execute your heartbeat.\"`\n\nBrowser automation: My agents use OpenClaw's CDP browser. Claude Code can use the same exec openclaw browser commands if you keep the gateway running, or switch to Claude in Chrome / Playwright MCP.\n\nTotal migration time: \\~4 hours including testing. All 17 agents running via crontab now. OpenClaw gateway disabled.\n\nAnyone else migrating today? What's your setup look like?",
    "created": "2026-04-04T08:53:23.000Z",
    "topComments": [
      {
        "author": "jake_2998e8",
        "body": "TLDR: Protect yourself from single Provider rug pulls - use or implement some kind of Model Routing.\n\nWe have several OCs doing various roles for internal use; on top of that we have managed OCs for clients. \nWe use Claude heavily but also aware that big companies do not exactly act on consumers best interests. So we built a compartmentalised infrastructure where 1 box runs the (multiple kinds) Agent instances or containers. 1 Box runs the LiteLLM Proxy. And another runs Local Models. Any provider does a rug pull, we have several local plus Online models on standby ready to take over.",
        "score": 10
      },
      {
        "author": "__gt__",
        "body": "I’ve been trying to figure out if I even needed openclaw since I started with Claude code, and this is kind of what I’m looking for!  I’ve been scheduling automated jobs for 20 years, so cron/launchagent and Claude -p has been so natural.  I’m having trouble wrapping my head around heartbeats, can you give me an example of one?  ",
        "score": 6
      },
      {
        "author": "bastardsoftheyoung",
        "body": "I was not going to reward Anthropic for pulling the rug out on a holiday weekend. I have been on a mission to make my pipelines less cloud model dependent so swapping out Opus for ChatGPT was pretty simple once I started. Did A/B tests on pipelines between Gemma 4 and GPT-5.4 and moved the ones that could move to Gemma 4. Ended up like this:\n\n - Use Gemma 4: infra, watchdogs, health checks, package/bill dashboards\n - GPT-5.4: main chat, writing, research, merch judgment, inbox triage, subscription analysis, design judgement, non-image design work, CAD, Rendering, Outputs\n - Draw-things-cli: ANE base image models\n - Cheap, No Decision Cron with extra spice: llama 3b\n\nWould have liked to move more, but maybe next month as acceleration continues.",
        "score": 3
      },
      {
        "author": "diddlysquidler",
        "body": "Dude do me a favor and take it down before they crack down on this shit too",
        "score": 2
      },
      {
        "author": "jairosk884",
        "body": "This post looks like it was written by Claude marketing team.",
        "score": 2
      }
    ],
    "titleZh": "Anthropic刚淘汰了我的17智能体流水线：我如何在一个下午完成Claude Code迁移",
    "contentZh": "今早收到了邮件。第三方Harness支持将于太平洋时间今日中午12点终止。我在OpenClaw上运行着17个代理——10个平台推广代理，7个内容管道定时任务。全部使用的是Max订阅。\n\n好消息是：Claude Code明确包含在订阅范围内。而且迁移过程简单得令人难以置信。\n\n**我的操作步骤：**\n\n1. 在每个OpenClaw工作区目录中创建了CLAUDE.md文件。这是入口文件——告诉Claude\"你是这个代理，读取HEARTBEAT.md，然后一步步执行\"。每个代理约20行配置。\n2. 创建了一个bash脚本包装器，用于运行 claude -p --model sonnet --",
    "commentsZh": [
      {
        "author": "jake_2998e8",
        "bodyZh": "简而言之：防范单一供应商跑路风险——使用或实施某种模型路由机制。\n\n我们内部有多个承担不同职能的OC；此外，我们还管理着面向c...的OC",
        "score": 10
      },
      {
        "author": "__gt__",
        "bodyZh": "自从开始使用 Claude code，我就一直在琢磨到底还需不需要 openclaw，而这正是我想要的！我做自动化任务调度已经 20 年了，所以 cron/launchag",
        "score": 6
      },
      {
        "author": "bastardsoftheyoung",
        "bodyZh": "我可不想因为Anthropic在假日周末突然釜底抽薪而继续支持他们。我一直致力于降低工作流对云模型的依赖，所以将Opus换成ChatGPT相当简单。",
        "score": 3
      },
      {
        "author": "diddlysquidler",
        "bodyZh": "哥们，帮我个忙，趁他们还没来整顿这破事，赶紧把它撤了。",
        "score": 2
      },
      {
        "author": "jairosk884",
        "bodyZh": "这篇帖子看起来像是Claude营销团队写的。",
        "score": 2
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "title": "How is it legal to have a pricing structure where the vendor controls the meter, the unit, and the amount of product consumed?",
    "subreddit": "ArtificialInteligence",
    "score": 34,
    "comments": 35,
    "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1sc85b4/how_is_it_legal_to_have_a_pricing_structure_where/",
    "externalUrl": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1sc85b4/how_is_it_legal_to_have_a_pricing_structure_where/",
    "selftext": "I’ve been thinking about this for months, and I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. How have we collectively agreed to a pricing model where the unit of measurement is a \"black box\" that the seller controls entirely?\n\nWhen you buy a gallon of gas, a gallon is a gallon. When you buy a kWh of electricity, it’s a fixed physical constant.\n\nBut a \"token\"? A token is whatever the company says it is.\n\nImagine going to a car wash. The sign says $10 per 5 gallon wash. You press the button, and today the machine decides to use 50 gallons of soap instead of 5. At the exit, the attendant says, *\"That’ll be $100. Yeah, the machine felt like it needed more suds today. Those are the rules.*\n\nThis is exactly how LLM output works. I can send a \"Hello\" prompt today and get a 10-token response. Tomorrow, the company can tweak the system prompt or the model's \"temperature\" settings internally, and suddenly that same \"Hello\" triggers a 500-token rambling response. **They have a direct financial incentive to make models more verbose because they charge by the \"word\".**\n\nIn any other industry, if your scale is off by 5%, you get fined by the government. In AI, if a company updates their tokenizer and your bill jumps 20% for the exact same workload, it’s just called \"progress.\"\n\n**Am I the only one who thinks this is insane?** We are building entire businesses on top of a pricing structure where the vendor controls the meter, the unit of measurement, and the amount of \"product\" consumed per request.",
    "created": "2026-04-04T12:36:49.000Z",
    "topComments": [
      {
        "author": "MongooseSenior4418",
        "body": "I think you are starting to understand the monetization of intelligence. The current tech paradigm is \"get them hooked for cheap/free and when it becomes ubiquitous, ratchet up the fees.\"",
        "score": 21
      },
      {
        "author": "joeyirv",
        "body": "it’s like nobody in this thread except OP has ever heard of the concept of the Office of Weights and Measures - https://www.nist.gov/pml/owm\n\nOP the answer is that legislation and regulation doesn’t exist for the consumption of AI services yet, like it does for gas, or produce, or butchers, or broadband, or utilities. part of the reason is that policy is always late to the party on new technology, the other is the aggressive anti-regulation stance specifically being lobbied by the service providers so they can define and charge how they wish.",
        "score": 9
      },
      {
        "author": "WoodnPhoto",
        "body": "It is legal because a business owner is allowed to set up any pricing structure they want. It is that whole 'free country' thing. By the same token consumers are free to not buy the product.",
        "score": 4
      },
      {
        "author": "Comfortable-Web9455",
        "body": "There is no general legal rule in the United States imposing fines for overcharging by 5%. Enforcement is instead tied to deception, emergency price gouging, regulatory regimes, or contractual violations, each with its own standards rather than a uniform percentage threshold.",
        "score": 3
      },
      {
        "author": "dnaleromj",
        "body": "Its their product not yours,  why wouldn’t the things you listed be legal?  Maybe you don’t like it but you are free to buy elsewhere if you don’t want to buy how they are selling.  \n\nYou can chose a different vendor and aren’t required to buy anything from them.",
        "score": 3
      }
    ],
    "titleZh": "供应商同时控制计量表、计量单位和产品消耗量，这样的定价结构怎么会合法？",
    "contentZh": "这件事我想了好几个月，简直怀疑人生。我们到底是怎么集体接受了一种计量单位完全由卖方控制的\"黑箱\"定价模式？\n\n买汽油时，一加仑就是一加仑；买电时，一度电是固定的物理常量。\n\n但\"token\"呢？token是什么全凭公司说了算。\n\n想象一下你去洗车。标牌上写着10美元洗5加仑。你按下按钮，今天机器决定用50加仑肥皂水而不是5加仑。到了出口，服务员说：\"一共……\"",
    "commentsZh": [
      {
        "author": "MongooseSenior4418",
        "bodyZh": "我觉得你渐渐明白了智能变现的门道。现在科技行业的套路是\"先用低价甚至免费培养用户习惯，等这玩意儿变得无处不在、人人离不开了，再逐步涨价收费。\"",
        "score": 21
      },
      {
        "author": "joeyirv",
        "bodyZh": "这帖子里除了楼主好像没人听说过度量衡局这个概念——https://www.nist.gov/pml/owm\n\n楼主，答案是立法和法规并不能 e",
        "score": 9
      },
      {
        "author": "WoodnPhoto",
        "bodyZh": "这是合法的，因为商家有权制定任何定价方案。这就是所谓的\"自由国度\"那一套。同样地，消费者也有权选择不买。",
        "score": 4
      },
      {
        "author": "Comfortable-Web9455",
        "bodyZh": "美国并没有普遍适用的法律规定会对加价5%的行为处以罚款。相反，执法主要针对欺诈行为、紧急状态下的哄抬物价、特定监管制度或合同违约。",
        "score": 3
      },
      {
        "author": "dnaleromj",
        "bodyZh": "那是他们的产品，又不是你的，你列出的那些东西有什么不合法的？可能你不喜欢，但不想按他们的方式买的话，你完全可以去别处买。\n\n你可以选...",
        "score": 3
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "title": "Peter Steinberger (OpenClaw Creator) credits Boris Cherny (Claude Code Creator) amid anthropic subscription ban for using openclaw - Complete Thread",
    "subreddit": "ArtificialInteligence",
    "score": 31,
    "comments": 6,
    "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1sc720i/peter_steinberger_openclaw_creator_credits_boris/",
    "externalUrl": "https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1sc720i",
    "selftext": "Peter Steinberger, creator of OpenClaw (an open-source alternative Claude Code client), publicly credits Boris Cherny (Claude Code's creator at Anthropic) for working to soften the impact of Anthropic's recent decision to ban subscription-based usage of third-party clients like OpenClaw. Boris responded by noting he's submitted PRs to improve prompt cache efficiency specifically for OpenClaw, emphasizing this is an engineering constraints issue rather than an anti-open-source stance. This matters to the AI community because it highlights the tension between platform control and open-source tooling ecosystems — and shows individual engineers at large AI companies advocating for interoperability even when corporate policy moves in the opposite direction.  \n  \nBoris Tweet: [https://x.com/bcherny/status/2040206440556826908](https://x.com/bcherny/status/2040206440556826908)  \nPeter Tweet: [https://x.com/steipete/status/2040298884787032103](https://x.com/steipete/status/2040298884787032103)",
    "created": "2026-04-04T11:40:59.000Z",
    "topComments": [
      {
        "author": "NeedleworkerSmart486",
        "body": "That cache efficiency PR tells you more than any corporate statement ever could. Policy says ban third-party clients, meanwhile the engineers are shipping code to make OpenClaw work better on their stack. The whole ExoClaw ecosystem keeps quietly improving because of this exact tension.",
        "score": 7
      },
      {
        "author": "jessepence",
        "body": "\"The biggest open source innovation ever made\" he types out on his Linux-based android before he sends the message through the Internet.",
        "score": 7
      },
      {
        "author": "justanemptyvoice",
        "body": "There is zero surprise in this move.",
        "score": 5
      }
    ],
    "titleZh": "OpenClaw创始人Peter Steinberger赞扬Claude Code创始人Boris Cherny，后者因使用OpenClaw遭Anthropic封禁订阅 - 完整讨论串",
    "contentZh": "OpenClaw（Claude Code的开源替代客户端）创建者Peter Steinberger公开感谢Boris Cherny（Anthropic公司Claude Code的创建者），感谢其努力缓解Anthropic近期禁止OpenClaw等第三方客户端采用订阅制使用所带来的影响。Boris回应称，他已提交PR（Pull Request）专门优化OpenClaw的提示缓存效率，并强调这是工程约束问题，而非反开源立场。此事对AI社区意义重大，因为它凸显了平台控制与开源之间的张力。",
    "commentsZh": [
      {
        "author": "NeedleworkerSmart486",
        "bodyZh": "那个缓存效率PR比任何公司声明都更能说明问题。政策明令禁止第三方客户端，而工程师们却在提交代码，只为让OpenClaw在他们的系统上运行得更顺畅。",
        "score": 7
      },
      {
        "author": "jessepence",
        "bodyZh": "他在基于Linux的安卓手机上输入\"有史以来最伟大的开源创新\"，随后通过互联网发送了这条消息。",
        "score": 7
      },
      {
        "author": "justanemptyvoice",
        "bodyZh": "此举毫不意外。",
        "score": 5
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "title": "A Breakdown of Destroyed / Damaged US Military Aircrafts Since the Start of the War with Iran",
    "subreddit": "iran",
    "score": 24,
    "comments": 3,
    "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/iran/comments/1sc7nbw/a_breakdown_of_destroyed_damaged_us_military/",
    "externalUrl": "https://i.redd.it/7wsnuc9zz5tg1.png",
    "selftext": "",
    "created": "2026-04-04T12:11:34.000Z",
    "topComments": [
      {
        "author": "AutoModerator",
        "body": "Readers, please consider making a donation to the [Iranian Red Crescent Society](https://donate.redcrossredcrescent.org/ifrc/iran-complex-emergency-2026/~my-donation). Thank you!\n\n\n*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/iran) if you have any questions or concerns.*",
        "score": 1
      },
      {
        "author": "SentientSeaweed",
        "body": "Weren’t two A10s shot down yesterday?",
        "score": 1
      }
    ],
    "titleZh": "与伊朗开战以来美军战机损毁情况详解",
    "contentZh": "",
    "commentsZh": [
      {
        "author": "AutoModerator",
        "bodyZh": "读者们，请考虑向[伊朗红新月会](https://donate.redcrossredcrescent.org/ifrc/iran-complex-emergency-2026/~my-donation)捐款。谢谢！\n\n*我是机器人，且",
        "score": 1
      },
      {
        "author": "SentientSeaweed",
        "bodyZh": "昨天不是有两架A-10被击落了吗？",
        "score": 1
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "title": "Faster Polymarket API orders?",
    "subreddit": "algotrading",
    "score": 16,
    "comments": 13,
    "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/algotrading/comments/1sbwxbv/faster_polymarket_api_orders/",
    "externalUrl": "https://www.reddit.com/r/algotrading/comments/1sbwxbv/faster_polymarket_api_orders/",
    "selftext": "Is there any way to get faster latency on taker orders via the API? I'm getting 25ms maker orders but 300ms+ taker orders.\n\nNews says they removed the 500ms delay but it seems like it's 250-300ms now. When was news of this, or is there a way around it?",
    "created": "2026-04-04T02:13:20.000Z",
    "topComments": [
      {
        "author": "Clarty94",
        "body": "There's a 250ms speed bump for taker orders in short term crypto.",
        "score": 3
      },
      {
        "author": "Tranxio",
        "body": "Taker always additional ms. Its somewhere in their t&c",
        "score": 1
      },
      {
        "author": "FanZealousideal1511",
        "body": "Yeah, I was also thinking that there are tons of opportunities in those markets, well…",
        "score": 1
      },
      {
        "author": "Intelligent-Pear-406",
        "body": "entry level server side swe here.  \nThis is my guess.  \n  \nThey may actually provide you requested data 'every 25ms'.  \nBut as you may already know, that doesn't guarantee that you're going to get that data 'in 25ms'.  \n  \nTheir data must be sent from their server, hop on network, many many routing, then it finally reaches your computer, encoded from signal to JSON format through L1->L7, finally you'll get the data.  \n  \nI hope this explanation can be helpful for you. Sorry if you already know this.",
        "score": -5
      },
      {
        "author": "GreasyKibbles74",
        "body": "Find out where they host, get a high quality vps in the same city.",
        "score": -3
      }
    ],
    "titleZh": "更快的Polymarket API订单？",
    "contentZh": "有没有办法通过API降低吃单订单的延迟？我的做市订单延迟只有25毫秒，但吃单订单却要300毫秒以上。新闻说他们取消了500毫秒的延迟，但现在似乎还有250-300毫秒。这是什么时候的消息？或者有什么解决办法吗？",
    "commentsZh": [
      {
        "author": "Clarty94",
        "bodyZh": "在短期加密货币交易中，吃单订单存在250毫秒的延迟机制。",
        "score": 3
      },
      {
        "author": "Tranxio",
        "bodyZh": "吃单者总会多出几毫秒延迟。这在他们的条款细则里有写。",
        "score": 1
      },
      {
        "author": "FanZealousideal1511",
        "bodyZh": "是啊，我也觉得那些市场机会很多，嗯……",
        "score": 1
      },
      {
        "author": "Intelligent-Pear-406",
        "bodyZh": "我是初级的服务端软件工程师。\n\n这只是我的猜测。\n\n他们可能确实会每25毫秒向你提供所请求的数据。\n\n但正如你可能已经知道的，这并不能保证你会得到...",
        "score": -5
      },
      {
        "author": "GreasyKibbles74",
        "bodyZh": "查清他们的托管地点，在同一城市购买高质量的VPS。",
        "score": -3
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "title": "Next GPT will be specifically improved for OpenClaw!",
    "subreddit": "openclaw",
    "score": 10,
    "comments": 5,
    "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/openclaw/comments/1sccyuw/next_gpt_will_be_specifically_improved_for/",
    "externalUrl": "https://www.reddit.com/r/openclaw/comments/1sccyuw/next_gpt_will_be_specifically_improved_for/",
    "selftext": "https://x.com/i/status/2040451208729817409",
    "created": "2026-04-04T16:01:12.000Z",
    "topComments": [
      {
        "author": "Particular-Gap-6998",
        "body": "That's good. The constant stopping to \"update\" me on progress while telling me it isn't finished for me to need to tell it to continue is annoying as fluff. \n\nBut I'll believe it when I see it.",
        "score": 1
      },
      {
        "author": "xyzsomething",
        "body": "But important question, can you use your Pro plan with Claw ? Otherwise it is pointless",
        "score": 1
      }
    ],
    "titleZh": "下一个GPT将专门针对OpenClaw进行优化！",
    "contentZh": "我无法访问外部链接（包括您提供的 X/Twitter 链接），因此无法查看推文 https://x.com/i/status/2040451208729817409 的具体内容。\n\n**请您直接复制粘贴需要翻译的英文文本**，我会立即为您提供流畅自然的中文翻译。",
    "commentsZh": [
      {
        "author": "Particular-Gap-6998",
        "bodyZh": "那挺好。老是停下来\"汇报\"进度，又说还没完成、需要我催促才能继续，烦死了。\n\n不过眼见为实。",
        "score": 1
      },
      {
        "author": "xyzsomething",
        "bodyZh": "但有个重要的问题，你能在 Claw 上使用你的 Pro 计划吗？否则就毫无意义了。",
        "score": 1
      }
    ]
  }
]